Recon

Model the
difference.

Move the sliders to your own catalogue. Every assumption behind the number is printed next to it — including the one that decides the answer.

Catalogue size2,000 SKUs

Monthly revenue$180,000

Legibility today22%

Products carrying schema35%

AI crawlers blocked0

$7,452

modelled monthly difference · Growth band

Composite legibility today25

Composite after enrichment94

Products an agent can act on today440

After enrichment1,860

Records unlocked1,420

Growth subscription$299/mo

THIS IS A MODEL, NOT A FORECAST. It assumes the agent channel can reach 6% of your monthly revenue, that enrichment takes catalogue legibility to 93% and schema coverage to 100%, and that every AI crawler is unblocked. The composite uses the published blend — catalogue 80%, schema 20% — minus 6 per blocked crawler, capped at 30. Nothing here is measured from your store; run a free scan for that.

Why the ceiling is stated rather than hidden

The headline figure is a percentage of your revenue, and the percentage is an assumption this product chose. A calculator that hides that input can produce any number its author wants; one that prints it lets you disagree with it. If you think the agent channel is worth less than the stated ceiling, halve it mentally — the ratio between before and after does not move.

The composite score itself is not a modelling choice. It is assembled from the same published blend and the same crawler penalty a real scan uses — the rubric.

Get the real number instead

Nothing on this page is measured from your store. A free scan reads your actual storefront and scores it against all four pillars, which is the number worth acting on.

Run a free scan →